The Institute for New Economic Thinking takes a broad view of economic research and supports it in many ways: through its main grant program, through working groups it organizes, and via conferences, panels, and other smaller gatherings of scholars across the globe.

Institute scholars normally publish their work in journals and books. While many – but far from all – of this work appears in working papers sponsored by the Institute and other leading research forums, the Institute also attempts to make its research results accessible to a wider public on its website. Below is a sampling of interviews featuring Institute scholars explaining the significance of their research in non-technical terms.

Mariana Mazzucato: Government Risk and Private Sector Reward

Is there a role for the state in fostering innovation?  
The usual caricature of government involvement in business, which has become especially prominent in the last 40 years, can be seen in the classic American aphorism: “The government that governs least, governs best.”  Admittedly, it’s a nice, pithy expression. And it has gained a powerful following among policymakers starting in the Reagan years. 
But is it true? 

What Apple Should Do with Its Massive Piles of Money

Cross-Posted via Harvard Business Review

An Open Letter to Tim Cook, CEO of Apple

Dear Mr. Cook, Read more

Who Invests in the High-Tech Knowledge Base?

Matt Hopkins, University of Massachusetts Lowell

A nation must accumulate a high-tech knowledge base to prosper.  In this paper, we provide a historical perspective on the interaction of household families, government agencies, and business enterprises, or what we call “the investment triad”, in providing a foundation for the accumulation of a high-tech knowledge base in the United States. Households and governments interact by making investments in education. Governments and businesses interact in the development of the high-tech knowledge base by investing in research and development. Businesses and households interact to invest in the knowledge base through the employment relation. Read more

JEL classification: 
H00: Public Economics: General
I00: Health, Education, and Welfare: General
L00: Industrial Organization: General
O00: Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth
P00: Economic Systems: General

Mariana Mazzucato's TED Talk: Government — Investor, Risk-taker, Innovator

Why doesn’t the government just get out of the way and let the private sector -- the “real revolutionaries” -- innovate?

The Two Innovation Economies

Originally posted on Project Syndicate

HONG KONG – For 250 years, technological innovation has driven economic development. But the economics of innovation are very different for those at the frontier versus those who are followers striving to catch up. Read more

FT Names INET Co-founder Janeway's Book One of the Best of 2012

As the year comes to a close, the Financial Times released its annual list of the Best Books of the year. And right at the top was INET co-founder William H. Janeway's new book Doing Capitalism in the Innovation Economy, which the FT named one of the the best economics books of 2012.  Read more

Division of labour was common knowledge by the 1770s

I always think of Adam Smith when I hear the term 'division of labour' - but I'm being cured of this by reading a bit more about Britains late 18th century in Jenny Uglow's The Lunar Men. A very good read on industrialists and doctors, it remarks on Matthew Boulton's (think steam engine / manufacturing) explanation to Lord Warwick (in 1773) that it is ithe seperation of processes which allow British manufacturers to compete with continental Europe. So Adam Smith's comments were not so much brilliant discovery, but rather explanation of well established fact: Read more

Manufacturing jobs will disappear - no matter where you are

just as the agricultural share of employment has fallen from 40% in the 1920s to less than 2% of the workforce in Europe today, manufacturing's share of employment will fall to less than 5% of employment. That is not jyst for Europe, according to Adair Turner's excellent dinner speech, but that is across the world. He has pointed out that it is not an issue of international transfer of jobs (although it dominates headlines) but it is because of innovation which makes the productivity of (manufacturing) labour increasinglty higher. As that happens, less and less labour input will be needed to prodcue the tangile products we need - hey, even China's manufacturing workforce has been falling for a decade - and the logical conclusion of such a tendency is that we won't need as much labour. Read more