The Fed

The Institute for New Economic Thinking takes a broad view of economic research and supports it in many ways: through its main grant program, through working groups it organizes, and via conferences, panels, and other smaller gatherings of scholars across the globe.

Institute scholars normally publish their work in journals and books. While many – but far from all – of this work appears in working papers sponsored by the Institute and other leading research forums, the Institute also attempts to make its research results accessible to a wider public on its website. Below is a sampling of interviews featuring Institute scholars explaining the significance of their research in non-technical terms.

Twisting in the Wind

While waiting for TALF

Bernanke did everything he could last week, short of a QE3 expansion of the Fed’s balance sheet, but apparently the market was expecting more.   A creature of habit, the market was fixated on the balance sheet that has done the global heavy lifting since Lehman, rather than on the balance sheets that are poised to do the heavy lifting now, namely the other central banks that jointly announced unlimited dollar lending last week, especially the ECB. Read more

Gerald Epstein - Banks: How Big Is too Big?

About the Interview

We all know it: The financial sector is bloated and banks are too big to fail. But just how bloated is it, and how much should it be shrunk? Gerald Epstein and his collaborator James Crotty use both micro and macro data to deliver the numbers. They build on James Tobin's concept of functional efficiency to separate the financial sector's beneficial activities (mobilizing savings, financing investment, and reducing risk) from its socially inefficient activities (gambling, and distorting the political process). An empirical study that is full of institutional detail and addresses the elephant in the room: big banks and regulatory capture -- this is new economic thinking. Read more


China as bank of the world?

By Daniel H. Neilson

Can the renminbi displace the dollar as the world's international money?

Writing in the FT last week, Arvind Subramanian argues that, "sooner than almost anyone thinks," the renminbi will begin to take the dollar's place in that role.

[T]he renminbi could displace the dollar as the premier, reserve currency within the next decade or soon thereafter. Sceptics will scoff for two reasons.

First, even if China’s economy overtakes America’s, the renminbi’s rise could be delayed...


Understanding QE3

Liquidity is not a problem within the Eurozone, insisted European Central Bank president Trichet last Monday.  But the markets didn’t believe him.  The question now is whether the announcement last Thursday of a coordinated central bank intervention—by the ECB and also the Swiss National Bank, Bank of Japan, Bank of England, and the Fed--gives more reason to believe.  Read more

Bank of the world, three ways

By Daniel H. Neilson

The U.S., in aggregate, acts as a bank to the rest of the world. The precise role of that bank has evolved over the course of the crisis. Read more

Fizzle at Jackson Hole

One silence, and one silo

So no QE3, at least not on the Fed’s own balance sheet, and not yet, but that was no surprise since expectations had been managed down by the time Bernanke gave his speech.  

What Bernanke did not say, maybe could not say, is that the major worry confronting central bankers today is Europe, and contagion from whatever happens there.  He didn’t say it, because he remembers all too well being dragged over the coals in Congress for the $600 billion credit line he opened for foreign central banks after Lehman, when the Fed stepped in as international lender of last resort at a time when global dollar funding markets were frozen. Read more

Sympathy for the Devil

Privatizing QE3

Pity the plight of the central banker.   The halcyon days of inflation targeting recede ever farther into the past, along with the glorious simplicity of agonizing whether 25 bp is enough.  Instead, the fate of the world seems to hang in the balance, even while the Fed Funds rate remains stuck at zero.

All over the world, central banks are stepping in to catch the falling knife dropped by their ostensible political masters, the issuers of sovereign debt.   Most notably, the ECB has extended its bond-buying to Spain and Italy, and the Fed has guaranteed another two years of ZIRP. Read more

Okay, leadership, but by whom?

And heading where?

The deficit in political leadership, both in the US and Europe, is the focus of FT commentary today (see herehere, and here).  It seems clear that another financial crisis is brewing, with its epicentre this time in European sovereign debt problems rather than U.S. subprime mortgages, but policy response has so far been woefully inadequate to the task.

But what would you have them do?  

As John Authers points out, "sovereign credits are no longer available for use.  The rebound of 2009 came once it was clear that governments were prepared to put their own credit behind the troubled banks.  This time around, sovereign credit itself is at issue."   Read more

Haircuts and Instability

Updating Hawtrey for the Shadow Banking System

Notwithstanding the U.S. debt deal—which takes default off the table--dollar money markets remain queasy, and longer term capital markets show clear signs of flight to safety, as market rates on the best stuff fall and rate spreads to the next best stuff widen.

Slowly, but surely

Slowly, but surely

Most people seem to be reading this as Wall Street reaction to changed expectations about the fortunes of Main Street.  Economic slowdown in the real economy is coming, probably globally, and consequently there is a premium on safe assets to ride out the storm. Read more

Moral Hazard in Congress

Fed to the Rescue?

The solvency of the U.S. government is not in any serious doubt.  The imminent S&P downgrade of Treasury debt is not about economics; it is about politics.   It is, at root, about the public display of political dysfunction in Congress.

One symptom of this dysfunction is the current brinkmanship over the debt ceiling.  Since there is no real solvency problem, the point seems to be to provoke a liquidity crisis, and to use that crisis to force the other guy to back down.   

On this point, impressively, bi-partisan agreement is the rule. Read more