The government and the market

Mention the government and the market and all academic reflection and civilized discussion dissolves into heated monologues. Politicians are an extreme case. 

Why so? Why for instance is it always the government versus the market, instead of, say, which form of organization to choose among government, market, culture and corporation? One reason must be Karl Marx, who reified the conceptual distinction between the production forces labor and capital into a fundamental struggle for power between the class of the laborers and the class of capitalists. A second obvious and related reason must be the deeply ideological Cold War between the United States and Soviet Union of the 1950s-1980s. In any case, it is unfortunate, as an understanding of the relationship between the government and the market is central to economics. How are the government and the market connected? Without any claim as to what is desirable or not, I think it is useful to distinguish between three kinds of connections.   Read more

Introducing the Jazz economist

You would have thought that to be a "jazz economist" was a good thing. I first imagined a "cool cat" that would entrance the hearts and minds of the populace. Not so.

I came across the term reading Frontpage Economics, a recent book by sociologist Gerald Suttles on the economic ontologies created in the press coverage of the stock market crashes of 1929 and 1987. Suttles (p. 80) writes that in the 1930s: Read more

HES 2011, Paul Samuelson and the Beatles

The 2011 Annual Meeting of the History of Economics Society (HES) took place in South Bend, Indiana, at Notre Dame University, under the auspices of Philip Mirowski, probably with fewer attendees than usual.

This time there were new elements in the way the meeting was organized: there were more plenary sessions, several of them with non-historians of economics (David Kaiser (MIT) on physics and economics; John Cassidy (New Yorker) on "How Markets Fail"; Rakesh Khurana (Harvard Business School) on the professionalization of business education), besides the regular HES Presidential Address, by Jerry Evensky (Syracuse University). There was also a screening of the documentary "Inside Job", followed by discussion led by our buddy Tiago Mata. Read more

Disdain or paranoia for historians of economics?

The organizers of Duke's Summer Institute on the history of economics were so worried that students might be embarrassed to ask their supervisors for a letter of recommendation, or that the supervisors would say it's a waste of time to study history, so they took a last minute decision to cancel the need for a letter of recommendation. Despite the fact that they offer student stipends of $2,000 and that it is taught by top class academics. In Realpolitik and economic terms, the need for a letter of recommendation is of course a barrier to entry, so maybe it was not an optimal screening mechanism to begin with, but it seems - to me - a little paranoid. Read more

A Cold Case

Shocks

The financial and economic crises started by the fall of Lehman Borthers came as a big shock, a financial shock, an economic shock, a psychological shock, and a political shock among others. From the start, a major question has been whether economists could have and should have foreseen this shock. Read more

These Things Take Time

Last week, I spent a few days in the Dalton-Brand Research Room, at Duke University, skimming through the Samuelson papers. They make everybody excited there, and for good reasons. Read more

In the Archives

Taking a quick break from my work in the Samuelson archives – so fascinating, believe me! – I can’t resist sharing the following, which I found in his correspondence files. Read more

Pop Archives

I was just amused with two projects by Shaun Usher: to “gather and sort fascinating letters, postcards, telegrams, faxes, and memos” in his blog Letters of Note, and to present interesting letterheads in his Letterheady blog. Read more